From f09e6432c5bdee5dd886fdc4632a91be656fb84a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: timkicker Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 13:53:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] deploy: 41e5e99abdc45295f4ac76f9d4018ec046cc4b8b --- 2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/index.html | 12 +++++----- About/index.html | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- CNAME | 1 - atom.xml | 12 +++++----- feed.json | 2 +- rss.xml | 12 +++++----- 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 CNAME diff --git a/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/index.html b/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/index.html index ec05159..c651d2d 100644 --- a/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/index.html +++ b/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/index.html @@ -192,26 +192,26 @@

Data about data

I am a huge fan of gathering, analyzing and evaluating data. Creating statistics and colorful graphs just has something to it. But the interesting part is not necessarily the data itself, it’s the data about the data. How often does something occur, at which time and by whom are very important characteristics when it comes to creating patterns.

-

For example, let’s look at the two weekday-graphs of two different WhatsApp-chats of mine.

+

For example, let’s look at the two weekday-graphs of two different WhatsApp chats of mine.

Weekdays Chat A

Weekdays Chat B

-

It is not that hard to figure out the difference between those two graphs. The amount of daily messages in A are pretty stable except Friday and Monday, which are two extremes. Maybe this could be about a friend group planning what they’re going to do on the weekend? The general quantity of messages are also lower as in figure B. The second chat also has a huge gap between Sunday and Saturday. Could this be a groupchat related to work? Or is it someone close who happens to live in the same house?

+

It is not that hard to figure out the difference between those two graphs. The number of daily messages in A is pretty stable except for Friday and Monday, which are two extremes. Maybe this could be about a friend group planning what they’re going to do on the weekend? The general quantity of messages is also lower as in figure B. The second chat also has a huge gap between Sunday and Saturday. Could this be a group chat related to work? Or is it someone close who happens to live in the same house?

You can see that it is possible to gather connections and create assumptions about certain topics without even looking at the data itself. Now let’s take a deeper look.

Days-Heatmap Chat A

-

How interesting. We can see that the group is most active between the end of January till May and spikes again in October. If you happen to live in Austria, you probably now what that means. See most Austrian summer breaks for students last from June till the beginning of September while Christmas lasts from December till January. There is also one small break during November. You can clearly see that this could be a chat between friends who happen to be students but don’t have the same classes together. Those friends probably spend a lot of their free time together, which explains the lack of data during the breaks.

+

How interesting. We can see that the group is most active between the end of January till May and spikes again in October. If you happen to live in Austria, you probably know what that means. See, in most areas, the Austrian summer break for students lasts from June till the beginning of September while Christmas lasts from December to January. There is also one small break during November. You can clearly see that this could be a chat between friends who happen to be students but don’t have the same classes together. They probably spend a lot of their free time together, which explains the lack of data during the breaks. No one texts another person while they’re sitting next to them… right?

Days-Heatmap Chat B

-

We can see that the amount of messages remains pretty stable. This could prove our theory of two people in the same household as true. The gap in August could be a planned vacation maybe?

-

It would be pretty frighting if I told you all our assumptions were correct. Right? You may now probably recognize that metadata is a lot more valuable than you originally thought. But what conclusions can we draw from this new gained awareness?

-

Most people rely on the encryption of their messaging apps. If no one can read my data then I am safe right? No. As we can see, an attacker does not need access your communication in order to gather valuable information.

+

We can see that the amount of messages remains pretty stable. This could prove our theory of two people in the same household as true. Maybe the gap in August could be a planned vacation?

+

It would be pretty frighting if I told you all our assumptions were correct. Right? You may now probably recognize that metadata is a lot more valuable than you originally thought. But what conclusions can we draw from this newly gained awareness?

+

Most people rely on the encryption of their messaging apps. If no one can read my data then I am safe, right? No. As we can see, an attacker does not need access to your communication in order to gather valuable information.

Just keep that in mind.

— May 18, 2023

diff --git a/About/index.html b/About/index.html index ad6f563..bd3e84f 100644 --- a/About/index.html +++ b/About/index.html @@ -191,7 +191,36 @@

About

- +
+ apictureofme +
+ +

Hi!

+

My name is Tim. As I already mentioned, I am a young student from Austria who also happens to have a great passion for programming. But there are many other topics which I can’t stop talking about.

+

And since I find it difficult to describe myself in sentences, I’ll just throw some buzzwords together

+
var tK = new Person("Tim","Kicker");
+
+tK.State = "Austria";
+tk.Interests = {"Linux","Selfhosting","Vinyl",
+                "Data curation",
+                "Privacy (Datnschützr würd ma sega)"};
+
+tk.FavGames = {"Half-Life 2",
+               "Lego Universe",
+               "Far Cry 3",
+               "Portal 2"};
+
+tk.FavLang = "CSharp";
+tk.LeastFavLang = "JS";
+tk.FavColor = "Black (If that's a color??)";
+
+ + + + +

Feel free to leave me a message! (github, mail, blog-comment,…)

+

c:

+
diff --git a/CNAME b/CNAME deleted file mode 100644 index f615793..0000000 --- a/CNAME +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -tim.kicker.dev \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/atom.xml b/atom.xml index 29ff764..0133e3f 100644 --- a/atom.xml +++ b/atom.xml @@ -9,26 +9,26 @@ Data about data <p>I am a huge fan of gathering, analyzing and evaluating data. Creating statistics and colorful graphs just has something to it. But the interesting part is not necessarily the data itself, it’s the data about the data. How often does something occur, at which time and by whom are very important characteristics when it comes to creating patterns.</p> -<p>For example, let’s look at the two weekday-graphs of two different WhatsApp-chats of mine.</p> +<p>For example, let’s look at the two weekday-graphs of two different WhatsApp chats of mine.</p> <p><strong>Weekdays Chat A</strong></p> <img src="/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/hourchartA.png" class=""> <p><strong>Weekdays Chat B</strong></p> <img src="/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/hourchartB.png" class=""> -<p>It is not that hard to figure out the difference between those two graphs. The amount of daily messages in A are pretty stable except Friday and Monday, which are two extremes. Maybe this could be about a friend group planning what they’re going to do on the weekend? The general quantity of messages are also lower as in figure B. The second chat also has a huge gap between Sunday and Saturday. Could this be a groupchat related to work? Or is it someone close who happens to live in the same house?</p> +<p>It is not that hard to figure out the difference between those two graphs. The number of daily messages in A is pretty stable except for Friday and Monday, which are two extremes. Maybe this could be about a friend group planning what they’re going to do on the weekend? The general quantity of messages is also lower as in figure B. The second chat also has a huge gap between Sunday and Saturday. Could this be a group chat related to work? Or is it someone close who happens to live in the same house?</p> <p>You can see that it is possible to gather connections and create assumptions about certain topics without even looking at the data itself. Now let’s take a deeper look.</p> <p><strong>Days-Heatmap Chat A</strong></p> <img src="/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/heatmapA.png" class="" title="This is an example image"> -<p>How interesting. We can see that the group is most active between the end of January till May and spikes again in October. If you happen to live in Austria, you probably now what that means. See most Austrian summer breaks for students last from June till the beginning of September while Christmas lasts from December till January. There is also one small break during November. You can clearly see that this could be a chat between friends who happen to be students but don’t have the same classes together. Those friends probably spend a lot of their free time together, which explains the lack of data during the breaks.</p> +<p>How interesting. We can see that the group is most active between the end of January till May and spikes again in October. If you happen to live in Austria, you probably know what that means. See, in most areas, the Austrian summer break for students lasts from June till the beginning of September while Christmas lasts from December to January. There is also one small break during November. You can clearly see that this could be a chat between friends who happen to be students but don’t have the same classes together. They probably spend a lot of their free time together, which explains the lack of data during the breaks. No one texts another person while they’re sitting next to them… right?</p> <p><strong>Days-Heatmap Chat B</strong></p> <img src="/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/heatmapB.png" class="" title="This is an example image"> -<p>We can see that the amount of messages remains pretty stable. This could prove our theory of two people in the same household as true. The gap in August could be a planned vacation maybe?</p> -<p>It would be pretty frighting if I told you all our assumptions were correct. Right? You may now probably recognize that metadata is a lot more valuable than you originally thought. But what conclusions can we draw from this new gained awareness? </p> -<p>Most people rely on the encryption of their messaging apps. If no one can read my data then I am safe right? No. As we can see, an attacker does not need access your communication in order to gather valuable information.</p> +<p>We can see that the amount of messages remains pretty stable. This could prove our theory of two people in the same household as true. Maybe the gap in August could be a planned vacation?</p> +<p>It would be pretty frighting if I told you all our assumptions were correct. Right? You may now probably recognize that metadata is a lot more valuable than you originally thought. But what conclusions can we draw from this newly gained awareness? </p> +<p>Most people rely on the encryption of their messaging apps. If no one can read my data then I am safe, right? No. As we can see, an attacker does not need access to your communication in order to gather valuable information.</p> <p>Just keep that in mind. </p> 2023-05-18T14:26:18.000Z diff --git a/feed.json b/feed.json index 36dc65b..3474acc 100644 --- a/feed.json +++ b/feed.json @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "url": "https://tim.kicker.dev/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/", "title": "Data about data", "date_published": "2023-05-18T14:26:18.000Z", - "content_html": "

I am a huge fan of gathering, analyzing and evaluating data. Creating statistics and colorful graphs just has something to it. But the interesting part is not necessarily the data itself, it’s the data about the data. How often does something occur, at which time and by whom are very important characteristics when it comes to creating patterns.

\n

For example, let’s look at the two weekday-graphs of two different WhatsApp-chats of mine.

\n

Weekdays Chat A

\n\n\n

Weekdays Chat B

\n\n\n

It is not that hard to figure out the difference between those two graphs. The amount of daily messages in A are pretty stable except Friday and Monday, which are two extremes. Maybe this could be about a friend group planning what they’re going to do on the weekend? The general quantity of messages are also lower as in figure B. The second chat also has a huge gap between Sunday and Saturday. Could this be a groupchat related to work? Or is it someone close who happens to live in the same house?

\n

You can see that it is possible to gather connections and create assumptions about certain topics without even looking at the data itself. Now let’s take a deeper look.

\n

Days-Heatmap Chat A

\n\n\n\n

How interesting. We can see that the group is most active between the end of January till May and spikes again in October. If you happen to live in Austria, you probably now what that means. See most Austrian summer breaks for students last from June till the beginning of September while Christmas lasts from December till January. There is also one small break during November. You can clearly see that this could be a chat between friends who happen to be students but don’t have the same classes together. Those friends probably spend a lot of their free time together, which explains the lack of data during the breaks.

\n

Days-Heatmap Chat B

\n\n\n

We can see that the amount of messages remains pretty stable. This could prove our theory of two people in the same household as true. The gap in August could be a planned vacation maybe?

\n

It would be pretty frighting if I told you all our assumptions were correct. Right? You may now probably recognize that metadata is a lot more valuable than you originally thought. But what conclusions can we draw from this new gained awareness?

\n

Most people rely on the encryption of their messaging apps. If no one can read my data then I am safe right? No. As we can see, an attacker does not need access your communication in order to gather valuable information.

\n

Just keep that in mind.

\n", + "content_html": "

I am a huge fan of gathering, analyzing and evaluating data. Creating statistics and colorful graphs just has something to it. But the interesting part is not necessarily the data itself, it’s the data about the data. How often does something occur, at which time and by whom are very important characteristics when it comes to creating patterns.

\n

For example, let’s look at the two weekday-graphs of two different WhatsApp chats of mine.

\n

Weekdays Chat A

\n\n\n

Weekdays Chat B

\n\n\n

It is not that hard to figure out the difference between those two graphs. The number of daily messages in A is pretty stable except for Friday and Monday, which are two extremes. Maybe this could be about a friend group planning what they’re going to do on the weekend? The general quantity of messages is also lower as in figure B. The second chat also has a huge gap between Sunday and Saturday. Could this be a group chat related to work? Or is it someone close who happens to live in the same house?

\n

You can see that it is possible to gather connections and create assumptions about certain topics without even looking at the data itself. Now let’s take a deeper look.

\n

Days-Heatmap Chat A

\n\n\n\n

How interesting. We can see that the group is most active between the end of January till May and spikes again in October. If you happen to live in Austria, you probably know what that means. See, in most areas, the Austrian summer break for students lasts from June till the beginning of September while Christmas lasts from December to January. There is also one small break during November. You can clearly see that this could be a chat between friends who happen to be students but don’t have the same classes together. They probably spend a lot of their free time together, which explains the lack of data during the breaks. No one texts another person while they’re sitting next to them… right?

\n

Days-Heatmap Chat B

\n\n\n

We can see that the amount of messages remains pretty stable. This could prove our theory of two people in the same household as true. Maybe the gap in August could be a planned vacation?

\n

It would be pretty frighting if I told you all our assumptions were correct. Right? You may now probably recognize that metadata is a lot more valuable than you originally thought. But what conclusions can we draw from this newly gained awareness?

\n

Most people rely on the encryption of their messaging apps. If no one can read my data then I am safe, right? No. As we can see, an attacker does not need access to your communication in order to gather valuable information.

\n

Just keep that in mind.

\n", "tags": [] } ] diff --git a/rss.xml b/rss.xml index 8eede35..edd75f8 100644 --- a/rss.xml +++ b/rss.xml @@ -13,26 +13,26 @@ https://tim.kicker.dev/2023/05/18/whatsapp-analyze/ Thu, 18 May 2023 14:26:18 +0000